Comments for Brew Your Own https://byo.com/ Thu, 23 May 2019 20:07:47 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 Comment on Answer for Shaken not stirred yeast starter by Colin Kaminski https://byo.com/?p=185813/#comment-492074 Thu, 23 May 2019 20:07:47 +0000 https://byostg.wpenginepowered.com/dwqa-answer/answer-for-shaken-not-stirred-yeast-starter/#comment-492074 I have done this too. At 1.040 it works surprisingly well if you don’t aggressively separate the trub and underoxygenate.

]]>
Comment on Answer for Shaken not stirred yeast starter by Harold https://byo.com/?p=185813/#comment-492063 Thu, 23 May 2019 19:42:29 +0000 https://byostg.wpenginepowered.com/dwqa-answer/answer-for-shaken-not-stirred-yeast-starter/#comment-492063 Latest technique on the web is to pitch dry yeast without even re-hydrating and no starter is needed.

]]>
Comment on Answer for Shaken not stirred yeast starter by Colin Kaminski https://byo.com/?p=185813/#comment-492006 Thu, 23 May 2019 18:02:23 +0000 https://byostg.wpenginepowered.com/dwqa-answer/answer-for-shaken-not-stirred-yeast-starter/#comment-492006 I agree that a stir plate might be to aggressive. I set mine pretty slow. Viability will still be a factor as any non-viable cells in the original pitch will not participate in the starter. Lest say we are pitching 1 Billion cells into our starter, to pick a round number. But, our pitch is 3 months old and got shipped through the Texas summer for 3 days. Our viability is only, let’s say 25%. When we do our shaken method we end up back to the original 1B cell count but we still have .75B dead cells (4 fold growth is a good guess). If we do this and got a fresh pitch that was not overheated the we end up with 4B cells and produce a very different beer.
To be perfectly honest, in a homebrewing situation, I prefer dry yeast. Dry yeast shaken not stirred sounds like a great idea and I will try that this week when I brew.

]]>
Comment on Answer for Open fermentation by reineborn https://byo.com/?p=185807/#comment-492005 Thu, 23 May 2019 18:02:09 +0000 https://byostg.wpenginepowered.com/dwqa-answer/answer-for-open-fermentation/#comment-492005 Just want to share my experience. My passion is british bitters and some say that british yeast does a better job in open wide fermenters. I tried a split with West Yorkshire Yeast (Wyeast). One in a wide open steelbucket put in my fermenter-refrigerator and the other one in my SS 3.5 gallon conical fermenter with a blowoff tube attached. There is a huge difference between them both in aroma and taste. The open fermented one is absolutely a better bitter. Go ahead and try. Put the lid on until you see some evidence of fermentation just to be on the safer side.

]]>
Comment on Answer for Shaken not stirred yeast starter by Dawson https://byo.com/?p=185813/#comment-492004 Thu, 23 May 2019 18:00:01 +0000 https://byostg.wpenginepowered.com/dwqa-answer/answer-for-shaken-not-stirred-yeast-starter/#comment-492004 You’ll be happy to know Denny and Drew actually address this method in the “Techniques” column in the upcoming July-August issue of BYO. Stay tuned for their views…

]]>
Comment on Dry vs. Whirlpool Hopping by Harold https://byo.com/?p=185822/#comment-492001 Thu, 23 May 2019 17:58:07 +0000 https://byostg.wpenginepowered.com/question/dry-vs-whirlpool-hopping/#comment-492001 And what temperature do you like for whirlpooling?

]]>
Comment on Answer for Gap spacing on a mill by Colin Kaminski https://byo.com/?p=185815/#comment-491999 Thu, 23 May 2019 17:54:41 +0000 https://byostg.wpenginepowered.com/dwqa-answer/answer-for-gap-spacing-on-a-mill/#comment-491999 Remember, your goal here is good retention of any solids that are not dissolved in the wort and a high efficiency sugar extraction. Milling to fine and you risk transferring husk and other off flavor producing things to the boil. Too coarse and you risk not getting enough sugars out to hit your target gravity.

]]>
Comment on Answer for Shaken not stirred yeast starter by Harold https://byo.com/?p=185813/#comment-491998 Thu, 23 May 2019 17:52:22 +0000 https://byostg.wpenginepowered.com/dwqa-answer/answer-for-shaken-not-stirred-yeast-starter/#comment-491998 The basic premise in the shaken not stirred method is that a stir plate stresses the yeast and is not needed. The viability isn’t a factor either as the yeast is multiplying at a rapid rate and you are pitching the yeast at high krausen.

]]>
Comment on Answer for Refractometer reading by Colin Kaminski https://byo.com/?p=185811/#comment-491987 Thu, 23 May 2019 17:47:21 +0000 https://byostg.wpenginepowered.com/dwqa-answer/answer-for-refractometer-reading/#comment-491987 If you can afford a densiometer it is fast and accurate. I think they are about $350 however.

]]>
Comment on Open fermentation by Colin Kaminski https://byo.com/?p=185795/#comment-491986 Thu, 23 May 2019 17:45:20 +0000 https://byostg.wpenginepowered.com/question/open-fermentation/#comment-491986 Interesting, yes, using spunding valves is really popular right now.
I always ferment to completion at 0 pressure. I have many friends who cap early, based on gravity. I have done some trials with fermenters capped at 15 and 30 psi with WLP001 variants. It is very important for the process to match the abilities of the yeast. Some strains will not ferment under pressure at all and some are very good at it. I am told that warm, 90F, high pressure ferments with tolerant yeasts don’t produce as much esters as a open fermenter. However, the fusel production remains very close. Since, I dont like the flavor of fusels, I have not pursued the process.

]]>